
Alright everyone, I promise to make this one short and sweet. Thank you all for humoring me and putting up with my online tirades throughout this semester. Senior Portfolio has been a strange but beneficial experience, kind of like speaking with Justine Kurland. Although I had seen Kurland’s work previous to her lecture at VCU, I didn’t fully understand it. Some of her work with the girl runaway’s was shown in a contemporary photo class and I remember being intrigued by the images but not blown away. Seeing the scope of her collective bodies of work was really impressive. Hearing her speak about the relationship that her images have to classic American landscape photography was also interesting. One of my favorite things about photography is hearing other people’s interpretation about a photograph. I loved when she showed a picture of these strange looking men cutting down the redwoods and said they looked like elves coming out of these primordial woods and the holes in the trees looked like big vaginas that were swallowing them. I feel like, I see those things too because once I hear it I’m like wow, yeah those really do look like giant vagina’s, but I think that in my mind those connections remain kind of subconscious. I mean I could never actually make all of those connections and verbalize them the way Justine Kurland does, but once someone points it out I feel like oh yeah, that’s why this picture makes me feel that way. I think that you must need a very good understanding of art history to think this way. Sometimes I feel that having a degree in art history or psychology or literature would help me so much as an artist and then other times I wish I could just be like Henry Darger. Anyway, sitting with Justine Kurland and showing her my prints was nerve-wracking and exciting because she has all of this knowledge in her brain and brings it all into you’re work when she’s looking at it. It reminded me of when I used to see a psychiatrist, you want to hear what that person sees in you but at the same time you don’t want to hear it because you’ll probably be told to stop doing something that you like to do. I was really happy that she chose my favorites as her favorites too. Then she told me why the others didn’t work the same way. Mostly in these the issue was they were too staged and not enough was left up to chance. I find that all of my favorite images usually have caught some moment that can never be recreated. Like with Justine’s work, my favorite picture she showed was the naked girl in boots with a rooster/chicken thing on her shoulder and it lifted its wing at just the right moment and in the photo it looks like she’s morphing into this crazy bird creature. From now on I’m just not going to take photos anymore unless there is some element that is left up to fate. Another thing she pointed out was that in some of my photographs the light comes in and becomes its own entity in a way and in others it does not. I love that Kurland uses no artificial light in her work and that the quality is still so amazing because I only use natural light so this advice was very welcome. She told me that I have a strong sense of formal composition which no one has ever told me before, and also said that it is difficult to shoot landscapes in a square so she suggested that I use a rectangular format. She explained that this is more how our eyes see. Makes sense to me. She also called me a romantic and ghost hunter, and we talked about William Faulkner. Then I disclosed that I was shooting with a pinhole and she told me to get a real camera. Oh well, you win some you lose some. So, overall my experience of meeting with Justine Kurland was like going to the therapist. She gave me a lot to think about and it’s something that I should probably do more often.


















